I dunno, whenever I've watched it seems like our best goalscorer isn't actually getting into many positions to score. Call me dumb but I'm struggling to understand how someone watches Morgan over the last couple of seasons and says "I think the best thing to do here is to change the formation and put him somewhere he can be less dangerous".
But yeah, maybe it's just a mix of bad luck and all the players taking a team decision to be lazy and shit. Definitely must be that.
Come on Jim, have a word with yourself. This isn't the time for careful analysis. This is a time for moaning and wanting the world to be different, even if we are not prepared to say what that might look like, why, and how we might reasonably go about doing it. No point attempting balanced criticism, when you have at your fingertips hyperbole and a cast iron conviction that your lazy assumptions are always correct.
What were the other bits? Ah yes, would you say that MGW is a great finisher, what are his strengths weaknesses...is he a tight space precision player? Let's forget about how we get there without being bummed...but if morgan was up along the opposition back line he's probably not the most precise at short creative passes...he's probably better as a quick delivering (slightly lower completion rate) transition or mid to long range passer.
So you might reasonably have a number nine who stretches the space to open up those sort of options, and play MGW deeper to get on the ball and hit the spaces.
My personal opinion would be that Ndoye, Schlager, and McAtee are the problem with this particular setup and formation...not the other two that you identify. Ndoye because nothing happens when the ball reaches him, Schlager because he's a trundler without the quality of pass, and McAtee becasue he is short range precision and doesn't have the longer range of (quick) pass. If anything I'd play MGW deeper, and McAtee further forward....maybe MGW is dropping in deeper in game because of this?
Where is his best position? Seems to me he's everywhere but the defence over the last few seasons. I guess his best goal-scoring return was the tail-end of last season when he was playing to the left of a central striker .... which is pretty much where he's playing now.
Well. Except if you zoom in a little and look at Morgan you'll see he should have 2.6 goals already. But he's got 1.
This is yet another attempt, which you won't like, at trying to show you that the problem is players are missing chances they shouldn't be (compounded by ridiculous mistakes by defenders) - and if they weren't we'd be doing fine. Further, if we continue doing what we are doing and creating the chances we are doing, then players should start finishing more chances and we should start getting more points. I don't see how changing manager improves the woeful finishing of our players or things like Milenkovic's backpass.
Still, you thinking we should sack Glasner, give ANOTHER manager a huge pay-off, and write off ANOTHER season cause we've "got to give the new guy the summer and allow him to install his tactics and buy his players" and then gamble on precisely who you want in instead is a perfectly valid opinion. It's just stupid.
Look, I'm not binary on this. Could the players be doing better? Yes, absolutely. Is the manager making them worse? Also yes. You pick out random examples like Milenkovic's error, but that guy has been an absolute rock for us. He didn't just decide to be shit. He's being asked to play in a different role, in a different way, that minimizes his skills and maximizes his weaknesses.
Good management isn't about imposing a system that you know and then blaming the squad that isn't built for it for their failure to execute it.
We were on the right track with Vitor, even arguably with Dyche. We have gone badly wrong with Glasner. It is very fixable though with one easy move.
Please though, enough with using xG to justify why the manager isn't actually at fault. It's complete nonsense and you know it.
I listened to the most recent Forest Focus podcast with Max Scott yesterday and this morning - I think I'm generally aligned with his view. The idea that we should be sacking any manager after 4, 8, 10 or even 15 game is preposterous - do we really need a shot of adrenaline that badly, that we need to feel better after a short period of any manager. If we continue at the rate we have been moving on from any manager then ultimately we will go down- for some reason this fanbase has convinced itself that we should be in the Premier league and this is our rightful place, does anyone else remember, the on loan to league 1 t-shirts, or the years slogging around the lower leagues convinced we had a right to be in the Premiership/Premier league.
the facts are that none of us know enough about managing in the premier league or the requirements to be a full time pro. Nor are we best suited to state what formation we should play, (we all know its 3-5-2 obviously) but I'm getting to stage where this is all tiresome and frankly taking away any fun there is in watching from afar - look at any match day thread on here and its like being in the Brian Clough stand 15 years ago - all sat on the sofa critiquing everything pass/shot/ save/ tackle. boo, rubbish, etc etc
if you look at well run clubs in this division, they don't bin the manager after 10 games, they stick with the process, they create a template for how they should play, they don't change who is responsible for buying players every 6 months and they reap the success (albeit constrained by the fucked up nature of football these days, outside of their control) - were often quick to criticise other clubs who fuck up through a series of managerial failures, yet 'we' don't have any patience with any manager - if we go back I suspect we'll find in Glasner's 2nd game we had people calling for his sacking.
you may or may not like the current manager - I'm yet to be wholly convinced but I do applaud the club for appearing to recognize the chaos of the last 5 years, where we battled relegation every season bar one is not sustainable. I hope they stick with it, because otherwise we really will be fucked either this season or next and I'd rather be in this league and boring in 13th than on loan to the Championship or league one for the next 23 years.
But the system is working. That's the point. It's making chances, and restricting the opposition chances. The players are fucking up individual pieces of skill. It's not that our defence is all over the place and we're giving away loads of chances, and it's not like we aren't creating anything either - we are.
XG is useful here as it's an unbias way of putting numbers on things I am seeing with my eyes which you don't seem to want to believe.
Given that none of our players are currently excelling in the system, and it arguably only really suits Munoz based on style, it ought to be quite impressive that we are relatively tight at the back and creating chances.
When Dyche lashed out at the players, it felt like he was covering up his own failings, whereas Glasner seems sick of covering up for the players. I bloody hope it works.
It's working so well we are second from bottom, with by far the least amount of goals scored. Yeah working a treat. I would have no problem with Glasner if he showed one ounce of flexibility and followed his own eye test but he isn't and seems to be alienating players. What exactly did Aina do to be treated that way? Everytime I have seen him this season he has been a hell of a lot better than the Serb who keeps making cock ups. Diomande was bought for the system and then not played for someone who cannot currently run.
Ah, I see, you want to get the team playing differently. Presumably in a way that creates fewer chances, gives the opposition more chances, but somehow our players are going to score more of them, and they opposition are going to miss more of theirs. Got it.
I don't need xG; I've been to nearly every match and I mostly agree with you. Performances, other than against Brentford have been good enough to be in a much better position. We aren't being tonked in any matches, and have created chances enough to win games (I'm not going to get into a debate about why we keep missing them). I'm all for keeping the manager but, the longer such a run goes on, the less confidence the players have. Palace was a big turning point IMHO: had Delap scored that goal then we would have gone on to win as I couldn't see Palace coming back from that.
However, as we missed good chances you could feel the tension rising. It almost felt inevitable that Palace would equaliser and so they did. Once the second went in, confidence drained out of the players. Of the matches I've watched, only the Coventry game (which I actually missed) and Brentford have been poor performances. My memory of the Coventry match may be coloured by being in the presence of a burly, long-haired native of Notts with a transatlantic accent shouting at the TV and damning the eyes of everything about the ref and VAR, but anyway it looked poor on TV.
Hopefully Brentford will inspire a fightback from the players. Up until now the away support has been pretty rock-solid behind the team and manager; they were still chanting for Glasner before the match on Saturday and McAtee has his own chant. The end of the match was the first sign I've seen of any loss of patience. There was some booing, some chants of "What the fucking hell was that", and the players did not come close to the fans (although McAtee did). Let's hope for a reaction on Saturday and a good performance.
Yep. Agree with all that. Even against Brentford there were good things. Had McAtee scored, as he should have done, at nil nil things might have been different.
I'm not an idiot. We can't just keep losing football games and stick with the guy. We'll have to gamble on trying something else and pray it works. But we've been doing that over and over again since we got promoted and it's going to get us relegated.
Plus, who the fuck are we going to anyway even if he does go.
Not quite sure I see the similarity. That season was, IMO, a bit of a freak. We got way more points than we deserved, mainly due to it being Chris Woods best season of his career.