Looks like Jim found the text formatting menu
-
Ref-cam out (Twatter link alert)
-
The Premier League's Key Match Incidents Panel reviewed the Nico Williams penalty at Liverpool and voted 3:2 that it was an incorrect decision to award the penalty, but 5:0 that VAR was correct not to advise the ref to review it as it was not a clear and obvious error.
-
It did look soft to me. I couldn't clearly see where he trips Neco.
-
Nico Varlliams
-
Loaf, that's shite.
-
Babelfish says: "The panel confirmed, by split decision, that the referee was wrong to award a penalty - but re-iterated unanimously that VAR isn't there to get the decisions right".
-
No, the panel confirmed that the decision was completely subjective given the 5 of them couldn't agree even with the benefit of multiple replays and as much time as they wanted to examine them, therefore VAR getting involved would have created no greater clarity and it was correct to let the referee's subjective decision stand rather than suggest he review it.
-
Babelfish says: "fuck off, spoilsport".
-
Varlliams you need to pronounce it varl-yums
-
Nico Varl-yums
-
Umpires call perfectly described!
-
Nope.
Maybe it will be funny tomorrow. I'll let you know.
-
If you are struggling, perhaps get someone with a sense of humour to help you out?
Don't know where you'd find one mind.
-
I'm sure Loaf has the determination to make this work.
Where there's a Will-iams...
-
I woke up this morning Loaf and my side hurt! Obviously my first thought was it was your quip but on further investigation it's just my distressed liver, sorry mate. Give my love to your mum.
-
Can't wait for a controversial moment this weekend so I can try again
-
I'll keep checking back and let you know how you get on.
