search
Sign in
  • chevron_right Threads
  • label Forest

Here is the NFFC news

Jeff_Albertson
11 May 2023
chat_bubble_outline 6.0K
  • check_circle
first_page chevron_left
first_page chevron_left
  • link
    Sean
    Squad 2391 posts
    5 Jun 2026, 5:37 p.m. 5 Jun 2026, 5:37 p.m.
    link

    Chief Execs are to us as managers are to Watford.

  • link
    Russ
    Squad 7405 posts
    5 Jun 2026, 6:01 p.m. 5 Jun 2026, 6:01 p.m.
    link

    Never heard of her.

    tricky likes this.

    favorite 1

  • link
    Simon
    Squad 7956 posts
    5 Jun 2026, 6:04 p.m. 5 Jun 2026, 6:04 p.m.
    link
    @Sean has written:

    Chief Execs are to us as managers are to Watford.

    And as managers are to us.

  • link
    Sean
    Squad 2391 posts
    5 Jun 2026, 9:05 p.m. 5 Jun 2026, 9:05 p.m.
    link
    @Simon has written:
    @Sean has written:

    Chief Execs are to us as managers are to Watford.

    And as managers are to us.

    I meant more for the randomness of unknowns that no one knew there until their departure announcement.

  • link
    Jeff_Albertson
    Squad 1429 posts
    5 Jun 2026, 9:34 p.m. 5 Jun 2026, 9:34 p.m.
    link

    Premier League ratified the new season today, with Wolves/West Ham/Burnley returning their shares and Coventry/Ipswich/Hull awarded framed share certificates.
    The new league table has been reset and Forest have dropped into the bottom three. I'm sure the chief exec's departure is unrelated.

  • link
    dj_bobbins
    Squad 1129 posts
    10 Jun 2026, 10:31 a.m. 10 Jun 2026, 10:31 a.m.
    link

    The retained lists are out - no surprises really, with Boly, Gunn, Ortega and Pizza Crouch all leaving.

    Carmo is still on the books. As is Cuiabano.

  • link
    crash
    Squad 67 posts
    10 Jun 2026, 11:07 a.m. 10 Jun 2026, 11:07 a.m.
    link

    Looking at the retained list, Omar Richards is another blast from the past.

  • link
    Jeff_Albertson
    Squad 1429 posts
    10 Jun 2026, 11:14 a.m. 10 Jun 2026, 11:14 a.m.
    link
    @dj_bobbins has written:

    The retained lists are out - no surprises really, with Boly, Gunn, Ortega and Pizza Crouch all leaving.

    Carmo is still on the books. As is Cuiabano.

    No surprise with the B team either. A move for captain Hanks, but everyone out of contract released (including all those who went out on loan with a view to buy (Hammond, Thompson, McAdam, none of whom saw the purchase option activated). Osong the only one who saw Forest first-team action.
    Presume more loans planned for Gardner, Powell, McNeilly.

  • link
    JimShady
    Squad 4694 posts
    10 Jun 2026, 12:27 p.m. 10 Jun 2026, 12:27 p.m.
    link

    Our academy frankly feels like a shambles the last few years. Bring back Gary Brazil.

  • link
    Jeff_Albertson
    Squad 1429 posts
    10 Jun 2026, 3:09 p.m. 10 Jun 2026, 3:09 p.m.
    link
    @JimShady has written:

    Our academy frankly feels like a shambles the last few years. Bring back Gary Brazil.

    I'm sure if we were in the Championship more players would have had a look in.
    But the pressure for results in the EPL (and from the chairman) means managers are unwilling to take a risk (although, tbf, they'll get sacked anyway).
    Plus the way the academy rules are, the top prospects just get poached by bigger clubs (look at George Hemmings to Villa, Matty Bondswell to Newcastle), so the quality is not as strong. We're just picking up those deemed not good enough elsewhere, or trying to spot good players at smaller clubs, missed by our EPL rivals.

    That said, there does seem to be a lack of a development plan with the young players apart from pin them down to long contracts, send them out on loan, hope they do well and then cash in. Certainly no route to the Forest first-team.
    We'll probably see a few youngsters to Portugal for pre-season for the first team, to cover for the WC players given a longer summer break/departures, then once the players return/new signings join, they won't be seen again (particularly with no European fixtures to pad the bench for).

  • link
    Seven
    Squad 1973 posts
    10 Jun 2026, 3:54 p.m. 10 Jun 2026, 3:54 p.m.
    link
    @JimShady has written:

    Our academy frankly feels like a shambles the last few years. Bring back Gary Brazil.

    These are the fruits of a Gary Brazil academy.

    It takes years to get a decent turnover and it’s even harder when bigger clubs pluck anyone out before we can offer pro deals, like Villa did with George Hemmings.

  • link
    JRs_Cigarette
    Squad 2715 posts
    10 Jun 2026, 4:38 p.m. 10 Jun 2026, 4:38 p.m.
    link

    Guess have to look at what made Villa more attractive than us and address that if possible. I'm not at all familiar with what happened to know if there was anything we could have done.

  • link
    Simon
    Squad 7956 posts
    11 Jun 2026, 11:10 a.m. 11 Jun 2026, 11:10 a.m.
    link
    @dj_bobbins has written:

    The retained lists are out - no surprises really, with Boly, Gunn, Ortega and Pizza Crouch all leaving.

    Carmo is still on the books. As is Cuiabano.

    As is Omar Richards, who moves into the fifth year of his four year contract: www.nottinghamforest.co.uk/news/2022/july/10/nottingham-forest-bolster-premier-league-return-through-omar-richards-signing/

    (Or we extended his contract at some point? Or he's, somehow, triggered an automatic extension without playing once for the club.)

  • link
    Loafer
    Squad 669 posts
    11 Jun 2026, 12:06 p.m. 11 Jun 2026, 12:06 p.m.
    link

    Harry Arter left him a cheat sheet

  • link
    Andyp
    Squad 366 posts
    11 Jun 2026, 12:49 p.m. 11 Jun 2026, 12:49 p.m.
    link
    @Simon has written:
    @dj_bobbins has written:

    The retained lists are out - no surprises really, with Boly, Gunn, Ortega and Pizza Crouch all leaving.

    Carmo is still on the books. As is Cuiabano.

    As is Omar Richards, who moves into the fifth year of his four year contract: www.nottinghamforest.co.uk/news/2022/july/10/nottingham-forest-bolster-premier-league-return-through-omar-richards-signing/

    (Or we extended his contract at some point? Or he's, somehow, triggered an automatic extension without playing once for the club.)

    It must be some kind of record! It must benefit us/Rio Ave in some way to have him loaned to them rather than sold to them.

  • link
    JimShady
    Squad 4694 posts
    11 Jun 2026, 12:56 p.m. 11 Jun 2026, 12:56 p.m.
    link

    Got me thinking. Is it something like this? Someone with a better grasp can correct me.

    2022: Buy for £20m on a 5 year contract. Immediate negative £20m on our books for this accounting year.
    2023: Worth £16m (1 year down), but Rio are paying his wages so not costing us anything
    2024: Worth £12m (2 years down), but Rio are paying his wages so not costing us anything
    2025: Worth £8m (3 years down), but Rio are paying his wages so not costing us anything
    2026: Worth £4m (4 years down), but Rio are paying his wages so not costing us anything. Now we sell him for £6m and book a £2m profit in this years accounts?

    At the end of the day we've still spent £20m and received £6m back. So it's bad. But it at least helps with different accounting periods? i.e. maybe we didn't mind losing the £20m in 2022, and really needed the £2m profit in 2026?

    (These are all totally fictious numbers of course just for discussion)

  • link
    noodle
    Squad 1113 posts
    11 Jun 2026, 12:59 p.m. 11 Jun 2026, 12:59 p.m.
    link

    It’s possible that the player has no interest in a permanent move to Rio Ave, but doesn’t mind being loaned there if it’s his best option for getting games.

  • link
    Simon
    Squad 7956 posts
    11 Jun 2026, 1:16 p.m. 11 Jun 2026, 1:16 p.m.
    link

    Reported that we paid £8m for him, can't imagine the £1.6m/£2m annual amortisation makes much difference, given our annual turnover is now north of £200m.

  • link
    Ingo
    Squad 3120 posts
    11 Jun 2026, 2:03 p.m. 11 Jun 2026, 2:03 p.m.
    link
    @JimShady has written:

    Got me thinking. Is it something like this? Someone with a better grasp can correct me.

    2022: Buy for £20m on a 5 year contract. Immediate negative £20m on our books for this accounting year.
    2023: Worth £16m (1 year down), but Rio are paying his wages so not costing us anything
    2024: Worth £12m (2 years down), but Rio are paying his wages so not costing us anything
    2025: Worth £8m (3 years down), but Rio are paying his wages so not costing us anything
    2026: Worth £4m (4 years down), but Rio are paying his wages so not costing us anything. Now we sell him for £6m and book a £2m profit in this years accounts?

    At the end of the day we've still spent £20m and received £6m back. So it's bad. But it at least helps with different accounting periods? i.e. maybe we didn't mind losing the £20m in 2022, and really needed the £2m profit in 2026?

    (These are all totally fictious numbers of course just for discussion)

    Maths with Mince is one of my favourite things on TB.

    Guru and RC like this.

    favorite 2

  • link
    JRs_Cigarette
    Squad 2715 posts
    11 Jun 2026, 10:50 p.m. 11 Jun 2026, 10:50 p.m.
    link
    @JimShady has written:

    2022: Buy for £20m on a 5 year contract. Immediate negative £20m on our books for this accounting year.

    It's a 20m cashflow hit but the p and l hit is 4m per year.

first_page chevron_left
arrow_upward Go to top
  • Return to Home
  • Turnstile
  • Turdle
  • Talkdash
  • Terms of service
The Daily Cut and Thrust at trentend.uk powered by misago