Slightly tangential but I saw someone make a point yesterday that framed things in a useful way I’d not really thought of before. We hear a lot about ‘western civilisation’. Obviously it’s generally citied by racists to justify their racism… but the status of religion in the US really marks their version of western civilisation as something that is entirely unlike anywhere else that would count, for those purposes, as ‘the west’. It is a deep and fundamental difference between the culture and civilisation of the UK and the USA.
We, here, must know that Britain is far more culturally aligned with the likes of The Netherlands and Germany than the USA but most people don’t see that because, I guess, the language and Hollywood. Same for Australia and, I guess, probably Canada too. We’re just very very different and religion is a huge part of that directly and, perhaps, indirectly (because maybe the way Americans cling to various other ideas with religious fervour is because the status of actual religion has warped their minds).
I'm not sure there would. The number of Brits visiting Europe is many times more than other third countries and so the system would have coped much better with the lower numbers if no Brexit.
Except the project was started 15+ years ago before a Brexit cute had even better considered.
So by the time Brexit became real the system was already mostly built to cope with the smaller numbers.
Obviously it's a government (and EU at that) project so is bound to be badly designed and managed, but Brexit is definitely a massive spanner in its works.
There seems to be an assumption that it's not doing the job it was designed for. I take the opposite view. It's doing exactly the job it was designed for.
The EU does not have to invest in systems to mitigate our stupidity. They want an obvious and clear delineation between the advantages/disadvantages of membership. We are not members, we are competitors. If they can send a message to every thick twat who failed to understand that, they are perfectly entitled to. If it adds friction to our ability to compete on a business level, it's doing it's job - that economic activity goes into the EU membership not to external third parties.
Wait… so the EU is acting rationally and in the interests of it’s people if it devises a border system that makes less attractive for people from the very large economy next door to visit?
If that were the case it would make them fucking idiots. Fortunately it is not the case. They just rolled out a new system that couldn’t keep up, and didn’t have a backup plan. A very normal thing for governments and companies to do.
Well if that was the case, the ultimate extension would be to give us free, or frictionless, movement.
It's not the case.
The intention is to take as much of a cut of the very large economy next door that they can...and part of that is denying us easy access to the benefits of their members. Including ease of movement.