Or if you were “elaborating” with Shady…
Or if you were “elaborating” with Shady…
Does anyone really get sucked into this sort of complete horseshit? Can anyone really think this should be so prominent in the news, with the other things going on right now ( illegal, in every sense, asylum bill, rinsing the public purse, back door privatisation of the health service, demolition of public services and infrastructure, removal of rights, the continued destruction of waterways through shit shoveling, selling off community assets to oil wealth, etcetera, etcetera )?
What's the opposite of a convoy?
A yovnoc?
I think it's a Ukrainian brand of schnapps but their factory is currently closed due to the war.
If you put Spiderman in a bath, will he get stuck in there until someone lifts him out?
Why is "virtue signalling" considered to be such a bad thing, when people are constantly demanding behaviours that are essentially "virtue signalling"?
The kind of people who squeal about virtue signaling are the exact same people who get furious about others not wearing poppies. So yes, I agree. Most of the pejoratives beloved of the right don't take much thinking about to realise that they are things that we should be lauding and pursuing. "Political correctness" - yes, being correct is good, politically and otherwise. "Woke" - meaning alert, eyes open, aware of your surroundings, as opposed to asleep and ignorant of everything happening around you, IMO "woke" seems like an altogether preferable state of affairs.
I got told I was; "one of those do gooders" at the weekend because I didn't agree with some racist comments. I took it as a compliment. Yes, I want to do good.
It's not really the thing that I spend a long time thinking about...it's the fucking idiot hypocrites.
I feel like when ‘virtue signalling’ first arose as a pejorative there was something there to be said. It was referring to people signalling in lieu of actually doing anything. So, for example, Tony Blair, a war criminal, wearing a poppy.. that’s virtue signalling. Indeed, literally every red-faced Tory wannabe-imperialist who wears a poppy is the worst kind of virtue signaller. When the signal is meaningless and in direct conflict with the words and actions, it’s a bad signal and worth calling out.
I used to wear an AIDS ribbon. I didn’t know anything about AIDS except it existed. I didn’t donate any money, I didn’t read about it, I didn’t talk about it.. I just wanted other people to think I was the sort of guy who did. It was a selfish act. I mean… I was 19, so I’m not ragging on me for it.. realising what I was doing was a very ordinary part of growing up.
So it’s not like Woke and Politically Correct and SJW, which are all describing broadly positive things. As people seem to like to throw new terms they learn around with careless abandon, doubtless ‘virtue signalling’ now gets applied to anyone suggesting something about the world could be better… but there is a real thing that, whilst usually being harmless, is worthy of a name.
I think recognizing an issue, and giving it some support and/or awareness is a bit of a thing. Even if it's just joining a broad consensus to embrace a positive thing, and big yourself up for being on the side of good. Even if it is in the absence of direct involvement or action. You should give yourself a break on that. We can't fix everything, there will always be casualties. Nobody has the capacity to affect everything. It's why collections of like mind people together in social groupings can have such power, where individuals are broadly powerless ( and why those who wish you harm promote the latter ).
It's a lot better than saying people shouldn't recognise, or talk about, doing something.
Yeah, I think that is fair enough.. at least where we at least recognise that our signal is little more than that, and respect the work of those who are doing more. But still.. we have to ask ourselves who the signal is for.
Where the signals become a problem is when the words and actions are the opposite of the signal (again, see poppies) or where there is not even the slightest desire to bring about the change that the signal purports to support.
Do baked beans on toast constitute a mostly balanced diet?
With or without those little sausages?
It does which a whisky chaser