Thursday is in many ways one of the best days of the week, but it's the only day of the week that never has any interesting football.
2 years ago
120
You could watch Roma V Brighton and cheer for injuries.
By the sounds of it the injuries are primarily in the crowd. The Italian hooligans have done a pretty good job over the years of letting the English and Dutch take most of the heat for being cunts when they're every bit as capable themselves.
Still though. It's not remotely interesting as a competition, is it?
Especially?
Most mammals have it, but humans and horses especially have it? How does that work then? What makes it not especial for those mammals that have it, but aren't horses or humans?
Trying not to reflect on international footballing bodies stating that a government regulator for football is problematic as there must be one body responsible for football governance in a national association, in the light of the inability to pin Schroedinger's foxes to any accountable authority and not saying a dicky bird about it.
Not doing very well.
The 'champions' league. What the merry fuck is that? I mean I newsstand that it's all about money, not football. But how on earth have people been persuaded to go all ra ra ra about propping up no mark foreign teams, at the cost of everyone's air miles, the wear and tear on players, destroying the domestic pyramid, and the cost to ordinary fans of what was community clubs, while diminishing the domestic product on display.
I just don't get how people are persuaded to buy this shit, but the whole thing can get fucked as far as I am concerned.
Why are teams promoted above a certain level made to rip out astro pitches, and install grass ones?
Given that we've moved to spanish dancing, with no tackling allowed, and all the players stay on their feet, apart from when they are diving, why does the game have to be played on grass? They should make astro compulsory, and then we could have completely covered stadiums so that we don't get piss wet all winter.
The FA are in cahoots with the grass seed industry.
You should see the back lawns of the FA executive committee members, pristine they are.
Independent regulation.
I'm not going to lie to you. This is really preying on my mind.
So an independent regulator. What are they independent from? If they are independent from everything what is the objective of their regulation? From where do they gain their powers to regulate?
It bothers me that people believe in this sort of lying wank. Someone explain to me how you think this actually works?
Quiet work day?
Busy, busy. Unlike some people who are pissing about on holiday upside down, having no answers to the important questions.
The jamie redknapp (could also go in made up name/don't know how to spell his own name) sketchers radio adds.
"As a footballer I'm used to not using my hands". Once he says that, I'm gone. So many thoughts. Can't get past it.
Tricky's mental health.
Thread won.
Football beer:
I have a nice large bottle of an esoteric three grain sour. I've only seen it once in a shop (when I bought it). If I use it as my football beer, and we win, it becomes my lucky beer. I've now got a sourcing problem for the final, and risk being responsible for our ultimate humiliation at the hands of a club wots never won nuthin (very forest). On the other hand, if I use one of the many bottle of my stock beers, and we lose, I have a fridge full of beer to throw away, and am no longer able to drink what is a favourite beer.
I hate football.
Right. So God is both benevolent and all seeing and all powerful, but doesn't intervene when children are being abused, or people are in horrible pain, and animals are being eaten alive, and stuff, because he wants us all to have free will. And the pope is the voice of God on earth, right?
....but he's voted for by a bunch of repressive old boomers, many of whom are quite clearly off their trollies. Who presumably have free will, because that's what god wants right?
So how do they always happen to vote for the right one, who is actually the voice of God, and not some Robert Jenrick-a-like?
