Turns out 9.4 was enough
-
I guess it is a true statement but it was max 18.4 so either a typo somewhere or the BBC are actually shit at maths.
-
Im going for the latter
-
Who is the best team that England have beaten to get through?
-
The differing targets were to do with rates if SA v WI was reduced to five overs a side as opposed to playing the full 20 overs.
-
West Indies on their home turf. Why?
-
Just curious, I'd only really consciously registered us getting rained off from a losing position against scotchland, losing to de cock, and battering the States.
I assumed we must have actually beaten someone of note.
-
So, looks almost certain to be England v India in the semi-final. (I don't have much "feel" for net run rate but I don't think Australia are going to overturn a difference of 2.2, even if they beat India.)
I'm not sure that's true. The England batting line-up has consistently destroyed associate bowling in this tournament. 109 from 10 overs was very gettable - they've just scored 117 off 9.4 against the US, scored 122 in 10 against Namibia, 50 off 3 overs against Oman.
-
It might be more likely that the Aussies get knocked out. If they lose to India and Afghanistan beat Bangladesh (both very possible) that’ll do it.
Which would be nice. -
NRR decides ahead of head to head, so Australia are 0.8 ahead. As I said previously, I have no feel for what that means (a narrow win and one by a few overs/runs?)
-
Yes, but they all need to be on the same points for NRR to apply. In the above scenario both India and Afghanistan would have more points than the Aussies.
-
Of course, yes. I'm being dim. Thank you.
-
Feels like Rohit is batting here like he isn't India to get 20 overs. Which should help them with the DL if their innings is truncated.
-
Travelling today so unable to watch. Am stuck with occasional checks of BBC page. Seems like a cracking match
-
Would prefer it if Australia weren’t making such a good job of this chase.
-
Saw the last four overs. I enjoyed how that ended.
