So realistically, by the time they've conferred, reached their decision, written a 50 page document to explain it, and socialised it in the corridors of power, we're probably going to find out between the Sheffield United game on the 4th and the Chelsea game on the 11th.
Dodging the accounts rules should lead to immediate relegation (as in, at the end of the season, so not immediate immediate). Especially given the impact on other clubs.
Any outcome where Luton and Forest survive while the Undead are still relegated is a very appealing one, so let's save City and Chelsea for another year.
In more concrete news, Everton have appealed their 2 point deduction. And apparently there's also the potential for a further, third deduction resulting from a different issue:
Same reason as Man City. It’s not a straightforward adjudication of punishment, it’s a more complex investigation into whether there is actually an offence.
So who is it proposed does decide that if not the independent commission I wonder?
Isn't it just an interpretation of how interest is treated. Seems like both sides put forward thier case and an independent panel decide. It's a single issue not the 115 varied issues of City.
Were Everton's so called owners (777 something), meant to have paid something towards the 160 million quid dodgy loan taken out for the stadium? I think that a payment was due today was it not?
Or are they just saving money by not paying the players after their dodgy performance against the southern cheating bastards?