Hold on there hoss. So the commission does not believe that there is any evidence that more income allows you to invest more than less income would, under a regime that dictates that the amount that you are allowed to spend is based on income?
I haven't read it...but if that's in there, it's either a massive bollock drop, or the mask slipping and demonstrating that they are not acting in good faith. You can say that rules is rules...but to pretend that income over the period assessed for P&S doesn't affect investment under P&S is a demonstrable error, or an intentional lie. It's at the heart of the matter.