search
Sign in
  • chevron_right Threads
  • label Football
  • label clubs

Other club football

Russ
25 Apr 2023
chat_bubble_outline 7.0K
  • check_circle
first_page chevron_left
chevron_right last_page
first_page chevron_left
chevron_right last_page
  • link
    tricky
    Board 7350 posts
    2 Sep 2023, 8:33 p.m. 2 Sep 2023, 8:33 p.m.
    link

    I believe it's a rhetorical device, using hyperbole. In the spirit that it might as well be true, if they are going to repeatedly make idiotic interpretations of the laws, that are contrary to the spirit and experience of actions in a football game.

    If you have suddenly become an adherent to the literal, we are going to have a lot of fun.

  • link
    BrettWilliams
    Squad 2214 posts
    2 Sep 2023, 10:43 p.m. 2 Sep 2023, 10:43 p.m.
    link

    James Maddison is a wonderful player. I mean he always was, but it's perhaps a little easier to acknowledge now he doesn't wear that stupid blue Lestoh shirt.

  • link
    Russ
    Squad 6436 posts
    2 Sep 2023, 11:14 p.m. 2 Sep 2023, 11:14 p.m.
    link

    Apparently no one has offered the Glazers as much as they want for Man U, so they're taking it back off the market.

  • link
    tricky
    Board 7350 posts
    2 Sep 2023, 11:20 p.m. 2 Sep 2023, 11:20 p.m.
    link

    Blimey. Who could have predicted that?

    [Winky woo]

  • link
    Russ
    Squad 6436 posts
    2 Sep 2023, 11:28 p.m. 2 Sep 2023, 11:28 p.m.
    link

    This can't be right, surely?

    i.imgur.com/aj2n1W6.png

    Carry this on and they'll be having a rivalry with Derby next season.

  • link
    Russ
    Squad 6436 posts
    3 Sep 2023, 3:20 p.m. 3 Sep 2023, 3:20 p.m.
    link

    Liverpool's third goal puts us up to 8th.

  • link
    Russ
    Squad 6436 posts
    3 Sep 2023, 3:57 p.m. 3 Sep 2023, 3:57 p.m.
    link

    ..... but Palace winning pushes us back down to 9th.

  • link
    tricky
    Board 7350 posts
    3 Sep 2023, 4:29 p.m. 3 Sep 2023, 4:29 p.m.
    link

    The manure stylist appears to have lost their mind.

    JRs_Cigarette likes this.

    favorite 1

  • link
    chicago
    Squad 2555 posts
    3 Sep 2023, 4:43 p.m. 3 Sep 2023, 4:43 p.m.
    link
    @tricky has written:

    The manure stylist appears to have lost their mind.

    I guess they think they are Juventus…

    Is Pogpa coming back on a free?

    Chicago: Arsey.

  • link
    tricky
    Board 7350 posts
    3 Sep 2023, 4:50 p.m. 3 Sep 2023, 4:50 p.m.
    link

    They really do look shit, and I don't just mean their outfits.

    We really should have got something against them, with a two goal head start.

  • link
    chicago
    Squad 2555 posts
    3 Sep 2023, 5:13 p.m. 3 Sep 2023, 5:13 p.m.
    link

    Well yes but the refs….

    Chicago: Still banging on about it.

  • link
    chicago
    Squad 2555 posts
    3 Sep 2023, 5:53 p.m. 3 Sep 2023, 5:53 p.m.
    link

    Oh look scum Utd get another decision.

    Was that a clear and obvious error? No.

    Decision should have stood.

    Chicago: Watching the big club bias.

  • link
    Jim7
    Squad 1033 posts
    3 Sep 2023, 6:14 p.m. 3 Sep 2023, 6:14 p.m.
    link

    Except they’re both ‘big clubs’ so surely that argument cancels itself out?

    Anyway, personally I think this is one that VAR got right and is exactly the reason it was introduced in the first place.

    Dave_Rave and des like this.

    favorite 2

  • link
    chicago
    Squad 2555 posts
    3 Sep 2023, 6:21 p.m. 3 Sep 2023, 6:21 p.m.
    link

    Well fuck me. A VAR make up call. He was onside. They used the angle view. (Kind of like MGW versus Palarse) No fucking way was that off.

    What an absolute mare VAR is.

    Can we can this shit.

    Chicago: Laughing wildly.

  • link
    chicago
    Squad 2555 posts
    3 Sep 2023, 6:34 p.m. 3 Sep 2023, 6:34 p.m.
    link

    Didn’t matter Arsenal scored 2 in the 1000th minute.

    Chicago: Highly entertained.

  • link
    des
    Squad 234 posts
    3 Sep 2023, 6:38 p.m. 3 Sep 2023, 6:38 p.m.
    link

    Thought that game was an example of VAR working well for once. The penalty decision looked right at first glance but the replay clearly showed that Havertz initiated the contact - exactly the scenario we were talking about earlier. And the offside was tight so checked - not sure why you think you have access to better angles than they do?

first_page chevron_left
chevron_right last_page
arrow_upward Go to top
  • Return to Home
  • Turnstile
  • Turdle
  • Talkdash
  • Terms of service
The Daily Cut and Thrust at trentend.uk powered by misago