Are they still whinging ?
Sliding Doors FC really can't take a joke or move oncan they, the yappy hairy small dog botherers.
Are they still whinging ?
Sliding Doors FC really can't take a joke or move oncan they, the yappy hairy small dog botherers.
Whatever.
I’ve done a IFW formula as I think that is a subsection of society as a whole with more bespoke parameters.
I've got Huddersfield Town on the phone. They wanted to let you know that you're an insufferable wanker.
Clearly fake news. They don’t have effete Southern Jessie things like telephones in Huddersfield. What’s wrong with strapping your message to a pigeon or a whippet like God intended?
To the foot of our stairs, tha nors...
@Russ has written:I think a sustained period of relative success will turn any fanbase into insufferable wankers. There are plenty of people who feel that way about us.
Pretty much every word in those two sentences is doing a lot of heavy lifting. Apart from Leicester and Derby, I’m not sure we are seen as insufferable wankers by anyone. And for those two fanbases, it is not due to the “sustained period of relative success”. They thought that when we were in the third tier.
Bournemouth and Brentford spring immediately to mind.
IFW= ((P+C) + £ + (N x £n) + BCQ) x BAS/(T+PS)
The bracket after the first C is redundant I think.
@Guru has written:IFW= ((P+C) + £ + (N x £n) + BCQ) x BAS/(T+PS)
The bracket after the first C is redundant I think.
Tough crowd.
AI agrees:
IFW= (P + C + £ + (N x £n) + BCQ) x BAS/(T+PS)
Needs more Madri.
AI agrees:
IFW= (P + C + £ + (N x £n) + BCQ) x BAS/(T+PS)
I’m not disagreeing. Would have preferred more commentary on the concepts as opposed to the mathematical syntax
Would have preferred more commentary on the concepts
It's clearly cobblers.
Not that I've actually analytically assessed your hypothesis in full. Glazed over at the first set of brackets. P+C makes absolutely no sense as a factor. Plus there's the units conundrum ( £ is disproportionately going to dwarf other factors - particularly for your Billion level spenders). These things make no sense as purely additive. The whole thing is an ill thought out, wet finger, clusterfuck. More medicine, than science, if you know what I mean. ;)
Thanks for the feedback. It’s true, definitely did not take long…
...you can definitely use some of those metrics...but lets not just casually toss off some F=m+a nonsense.
Fosters = Madri × Amstel?
...you can definitely use some of those metrics...but lets not just casually toss off some F=m+a nonsense.
I don’t casually toss off at my age. But feel free to knock one out
…a revised equation, that is.
Super ending to the scouse derby and amusing watching Liverpool lose their heads.