The something is that if they aren't seen to be making every effort to get decisions correct, the betting companies will stop advertising with them so much. VAR exists for gamblers and fantasy football players, not football fans.
Maybe. Why insist that offside is a matter of fact, when it isn't because:
You can't measure when the ball actually leaves the foot.
You can't accurately determine a 3d relative position, from a 2d picture not in line.
That leads to a margin of error that must exist. It's not acknowledged, there is no allowance for it, and it's not subsequently scrutinised. No corrective actions have been taken in the cases where clear errors have been made, and they continue to be made. They don't even let people in the ground see what they are doing.
You may observe this happens in a data driven world where sufficient computing power exists to link your spending, recreation, and health records, and program you in how you walk around a supermarket.
Smells funny if you even vaguely understand the process. For those who might, they've fucked up all the rules ( interpretation of the laws) to give them the wiggle room for plausible deniability. There's nothing in there that makes the game better, simpler, fairer, or keeps it flowing. Which is the pretend objective. If that really is what they are trying to achieve, it's a complete failure on every level.
I gather offside VAR is going to be fully automated from next season, so it might help with removing the human element of when exactly the camera is frozen for drawing the lines. It'll still be shit though.
They've found a use for AI then. Trouble is that much of the popular "AI" is based on the answer most likely to be accepted, which is going to be "Man U player therefore onside"
Correction: Liverpool look absolutely fucking shite. Comical defense straight out of the Nottingham Forest Big Book Of Calamities to let Everton go 1-0 up.