Grimsby vs Notts looked like value for money.
If the sheep win their games in hand they'll go top of the division.
The referee and VAR ignore a clear foul on Anthony Gordon. Shitty go down the other and and score. Game changing.
The crap laws, and worse officiating, have completely ruined the game.
Still, the football itself is a terrific advert for the Premier League.
I wasn't watching but son said absolutely no way a foul before the goal.
I don't think it was a foul either.
There is a debate to be had as to the laws and their interpretation, but that's given as a foul on the keeper in almost every other professionally officiated game across the world. And certainly has been many times.
Either way, something is wrong.
You should apply to the PGMOL. I think that you have the sort of stuff that they are looking for.
Say we agree that's not a foul. Not attempting to play the ball, putting your arm across someone, and running them off the ball is completely fine. How many fouls have been incorrectly given where that, or less than that, has happened?
I like not this news.
Bring me some other news.
Everton Villa starting to get tasty. Ref has lost the cue ball in this one. Expect fighting in the tunnel at full time. If not before.
Ah! Good news!
Let there be joy and celebration!
I don't mind Jonny Evans as a player, but what the merry fuck is he doing in manure's side at this stage of his career?
Verner is going to be a great signing for Tottenham, I fear.
Onana is still gash.
This manure side are terrible. The number of times the opposition just turn upfield and run, and it's enough to get free, is a disgrace at this level.
Not sure if been mentioned here but the shit going on at Reading is quite something.
Just read EfL statement which implores the owner to either put money in or sell his stake. Presumably they approved him as fit and proper when he took over though.
He's owned the club since 2017. The EFL Owners and Directors Test confirms that a prospective owner isn't prevented from buying a club, either legally or through ownership or disqualification in another league, that they have the money to buy it, and that they can afford the running costs for the coming season.
The test is not, has not ever been, and probably never could be, designed to allow the league to prevent an acquisition because a prospective owner seems like the kind of shifty cunt who's going to run it into the ground in a few years' time.
Isn't it only shifty cunts that have the necessary sort of money?
It's a system set up to fail.
