search
Sign in
  • chevron_right Threads
  • label Football
  • label clubs

Other club football

Russ
25 Apr 2023
chat_bubble_outline 9.0K
first_page chevron_left
chevron_right last_page
first_page chevron_left
chevron_right last_page
  • link
    des
    Squad 271 posts
    30 May 2026, 8:04 p.m. 30 May 2026, 8:04 p.m.
    link

    If he’d been refereed properly this season then penalties would’ve been his undoing a long time before today.

    JimShady, Resident_Alien, JRs_Cigarette and 1 other user like this.

    favorite 4

  • link
    Dave_Rave
    Squad 4479 posts
    30 May 2026, 8:15 p.m. 30 May 2026, 8:15 p.m.
    link

    The day Gabriel and Virgil Van Dijk wrestle each other at a corner and both get booked the world might just end.

  • link
    Guru
    Squad 1772 posts
    31 May 2026, 1:55 p.m. 31 May 2026, 1:55 p.m.
    link
    @Dave_Rave has written:

    The MGW stutter tribute - and Eze misses.

    Which, in fairness, MGW normally does as well.

  • link
    Simon
    Squad 8135 posts
    1 Jun 2026, 6:19 p.m. 1 Jun 2026, 6:19 p.m.
    link

    Southampton appear to have started using Marinakis as a media advisor: www.southamptonfc.com/en/news/article/club-statement-1st-june-2026

  • link
    tricky
    Board 8351 posts
    1 Jun 2026, 7:02 p.m. 1 Jun 2026, 7:02 p.m.
    link
    Babelfish has written:

    an error of judgement for which we take responsibility.....but meanies picked on us, and it's not fair.

  • link
    JRs_Cigarette
    Squad 2795 posts
    1 Jun 2026, 7:08 p.m. 1 Jun 2026, 7:08 p.m.
    link

    We aren't sorry we did it just sorry we got caught

  • link
    Russ
    Squad 7565 posts
    1 Jun 2026, 7:44 p.m. 1 Jun 2026, 7:44 p.m.
    link

    I commend them for stopping short of "and everyone else does it anyway", because I have zero doubt that they do.

  • link
    JRs_Cigarette
    Squad 2795 posts
    1 Jun 2026, 9:37 p.m. 1 Jun 2026, 9:37 p.m.
    link

    I don't think so, I just don't see the upside worth the risk

    (Soton lost one and drew 2 of the three in the case. Guess you could argue they might have lost the draws without the intel but I'm not convinced).

  • link
    tricky
    Board 8351 posts
    1 Jun 2026, 9:57 p.m. 1 Jun 2026, 9:57 p.m.
    link

    Doubt that's the only times that they did it.

    Anyway, advantage gained is not at all the point. They repeatedly did something that they knew was against the rules....however bonkers they are at times.

    JimShady likes this.

    favorite 1

  • link
    JRs_Cigarette
    Squad 2795 posts
    1 Jun 2026, 10:48 p.m. 1 Jun 2026, 10:48 p.m.
    link

    Agreed, I'm just not at all convinced everyone does it.

  • link
    tricky
    Board 8351 posts
    1 Jun 2026, 11:52 p.m. 1 Jun 2026, 11:52 p.m.
    link

    Sure. Never underestimate man's ability to be a perpetual dickhead.

  • link
    Russ
    Squad 7565 posts
    1 Jun 2026, 11:58 p.m. 1 Jun 2026, 11:58 p.m.
    link

    As the old expression goes: if you ain't cheating, you ain't trying.

  • link
    Russ
    Squad 7565 posts
    2 Jun 2026, 3:35 a.m. 2 Jun 2026, 3:35 a.m.
    link

    On that same topic: Southampton have said they won't fire Eckert as it's allowed, or at least tolerated, in Europe, and they claim that he didn't realise it was banned here.

    If one were of a cynical nature one might be tempted to wonder if they'd rather let the FA ban him, allowing them to fire him for cause and save themselves the severance payment.

  • link
    Ingo
    Squad 3165 posts
    2 Jun 2026, 7:27 a.m. 2 Jun 2026, 7:27 a.m.
    link

    Didn't he only lose the games where they were spying? If they cut the cheating they'll be so far out in front the 4 points will be the subject of the classic "who give a fuck" ditty before you can say "you need a bigger tree, pal".

  • link
    JRs_Cigarette
    Squad 2795 posts
    2 Jun 2026, 8:05 a.m. 2 Jun 2026, 8:05 a.m.
    link
    @Russ has written:

    fire him for cause

    Pretty sure they could fire him for cause with what he's done (not knowing what is cheating is on him), I just think they want to keep him

  • link
    Simon
    Squad 8135 posts
    2 Jun 2026, 9:19 a.m. 2 Jun 2026, 9:19 a.m.
    link
    @tricky has written:

    Doubt that's the only times that they did it.

    The bits from the whatsapps do provide some support that they might have been. They don't feel like it's a routine occurrence with just the specifics that the manager wanted checked - they wanted specific information on each of the opponents (Oxford's formation under the new manager, Hackney's fitness and just the importance of the Ipswich game, combined with how close they were training). And it was all dependent on the Southampton guy being able to actually view the training (presumably if you wanted to spy on Forest, you'd have to bribe someone in one of the houses overlooking Wilford Lane).

first_page chevron_left
chevron_right last_page
arrow_upward Go to top
  • Return to Home
  • Turnstile
  • Turdle
  • Talkdash
  • Terms of service
The Daily Cut and Thrust at trentend.uk powered by misago