• Russpanorama_fish_eye
    6 months ago

    If Leicester lose tomorrow they'll effectively be 7 points adrift given the GD gap between them and Wolves. Being three results better than Wolves over the remaining 10 games seems like a big ask.

  • Jakepanorama_fish_eye
    6 months ago

    Was just looking at the table. If Leicester continue with their points per game to date, Wolves need one win to finish above them.

  • Mangetoutpanorama_fish_eye
    6 months ago

    Leicester's last 5 games of the season include Southampton, Wolves and Ipswich, as well as us.

    If they weren't playing terribly, that would be reason for optimism.

  • Jim7lens
    6 months ago

    I see Spence dozed off for Bournemouth’s goal

  • Russpanorama_fish_eye
    6 months ago

    I don't mind Leicester picking up a point today.

  • Jim7lens
    6 months ago

    Ditto. Can’t believe I’m cheering for Leicester, Tottenham and Man Utd!

  • BrettWilliamspanorama_fish_eye
    6 months ago

    1-0 Chelsea. Sideshow Bob.

  • trickylens
    6 months ago

    Casimero/Fernandez comprise the manure midfield. Should go well.

  • Simonhelp_outline
    6 months ago

    How did we let Hoijlund score?

  • trickylens
    6 months ago

    Some sort of weird act of charity? He's fucking useless.

  • chicagopanorama_fish_eye
    6 months ago

    Tottetington helped us out. Chelsea got lucky against Fester and weren't very good.

    Arse cannot beat Man Ure and look the most likely to lose.

    I think we might be alright.

    Chicago: Still operating on one device.

  • Mangetoutpanorama_fish_eye
    6 months ago

    I would settle for second.

  • trickylens
    6 months ago

    Jonah!

  • Jim7lens
    6 months ago
  • trickylens
    6 months ago

    Not really. The BBC has been brought to heel under attack (financial political), it has been overtaken by fascist overlords, and it's production values and content eviscerated. totally intentionally. If the BBC is an elite service, why would you pay for the competing service provision, who needs an ever increasing revenue stream to pay right wing politicians backhanders?

    I've explained it before, I shall explain it again. It's a very simple model. They take your stuff, sell it off pretending that it's for reasons. Then they give the cash to their mates, while you pay an ever increasing price for a service that gets worse and costs more (that was supposed to get better and be cheaper...because markets).

    One person making do with just highlights, is one too many for them.

    Nothing personal. Just business.

  • Jim7lens
    6 months ago

    Erm ok. But it is contentious because some people like the idea, and many don’t. There is therefore some contention.

Search
  • Enter search query (at least 3 characters).

Your options