Some of the criticisms of the Decision have involved a minute examination of the words used by the Commission. Decisions such as these should not be subjected to microscopic forensic examination and interpreted as if they were statutes which have been drafted by Parliamentary Counsel. Allegations of infelicities of language or errors which are not material to the ultimate decision add to the complexity and costs of proceedings and are rarely likely to lead to a successful challenge of a decision.
They got a load of money for Maresca and Dewsbury-Hall, which would be 100% to the bottom line. If they still fail, they are totally out of control - I know they were a top 8 wage payer when they got relegated, but still.