I presume every club has a statement like that.
I don't feel it's worth writing down really. Forest can ban whomever they like for whatever reason they like.
I presume every club has a statement like that.
I don't feel it's worth writing down really. Forest can ban whomever they like for whatever reason they like.
I have no problem if that is applied equally and fairly. As long as this fake world where free speech and fair comment is punished for all rather than just for the few. For example I assume the owner is sanctioned?
I presume that's aimed more at the kind of online pond dweller that racially abuses a player on Twitter for something he's done to offend Nottingham Forest.
That's not what it says though, is it?
Me too, but as Tricky points out, it's not what it says.
It's so vague as to give the club free reign to ban anyone it doesn't like. (and we already know the owner has a massive, but very fragile ego)
(See also Wendies banning anyone wearing a 'fake' shirt)
It's so vague as to give the club free reign to ban anyone it doesn't like.
But they can do that anyway right?
All this amuses me. When (and it's surely when not if) we go back to our natural level of mid to high championship team and attendances are 12k for a midweek game, touching 20k for a Saturday then let's see how much they apply these policies about ticket transfers etc.
Life is cyclical.
I do feel a little uncomfortable about the headlines suggesting anyone involved in the rioting would face bans from football grounds.
On the face of it, yeah great.
But then what, where does this extend to? Others with criminal convictions? Then views that people don’t like?
The line between throwing bricks at emergency crews and looting Greggs, to saying Marinakis is a prick to your 50 Twitter follows is a pretty huge gulf.
Then views that people don’t like?
If that means Lee Anderson gets his season card confiscated so I no longer have to endure his smug, racist face at games, then yes.
Also does any really mind if 30p Lee gets banned from the WFCG for being an objectionable cunt with reprehensible views?
Unless he’s paying out of his own pocket we might have seen the last of him (and Bradley) seeing as they aren’t in government any longer. Freeloading scum.
The line between throwing bricks at emergency crews and looting Greggs, to saying Marinakis is a prick to your 50 Twitter follows is a pretty huge gulf.
It’s where it ends up, Jim.
Unless he’s paying out of his own pocket we might have seen the last of him (and Bradley) seeing as they aren’t in government any longer. Freeloading scum.
Sadly Bradders is still County council leader and probably still trying to lure Moronakis to Toton.
aren’t in government any longer
Anderson is still an MP isn't he?