Relatable.
-
Outline application for BC Stand redevelopment also approved (reportedly, as the live stream has crashed).
-
Representing the whiny gripes of their noisiest constituents, rather than the actual benefit of the area they are supposed to be acting in the interests of,
-
So, if I've understood correctly, we can't begin any building until we've addressed the safe movement of several thousand additional fans, which seemingly requires the building of a new bridge. Is that right?
-
That's kind of my take too. Though the answer doesn't have to be a new bridge.
This is why I'm not very optimistic that yesterday's meeting has really made any progress. A new bridge is surely a huge undertaking given where it'll need to be located.
-
The new foot bridge nearby took about 6 years to sort from what I've read
I hope we still stay the course with this though and don't use this to push for a new site miles out again
-
Trebuchet.
Tunnel.
Teleportation.
The three tees.
-
I don't get why the idea of closing one lane of Trent Bridge for an hour after the game has seemingly been abandoned.
-
I thought the new bridge was for the second part. But only because they seemed to say that the first stage had full planning permission.
-
Is that for any of the project to start or before the BC stand expansion can start?
I’m not sure a new bridge has to be a barrier in terms of cash, Would an extra (reported) £20m would derail a near £800m project? It’s just the time to get it through that could be ridiculous.
-
If we're going to try and do a bridge this is surely the location and land ....
-
I don't know - that was really what I was trying to clarify. You're absolutely right regarding the potential time.
