15 in 34. Still probably not worth a couple of million. He signed a new 3 year deal with us last summer so I suspect it will be a Championship loan next season.
I was about to link that piece as the absolute nadir of how “data” has finally ruined football. There is a bunch of trivial data and precisely zero insight. Some fuckers have been paid for that piece of crap masquerading as journalism. I had to check the date.
It looks to be based on one game. Assuming that's Villa, we looked a shambles defensively from the outset and conceded two early goals, then changed approach and had a number of near misses. Not reallly a "normal" game to assess him on.
If there was any point to the exercise, you'd want to look at a number of games and, especially, a mix of home and away games.
Don't be silly. Everyone knows that you can measure a managers effectiveness by where he stands in the technical area. Based on a small sample size.
[reads article]
Except that it's inconclusive. With the major insights based around what Nigel Pearson says. Even what sort of trousers they wear proving troublingly uninformative.
How many posts about a pointless mundane subject before Guru looses his shit? Could anyone do a formula to work it out? Chic maybe? Not Loaf, obviously. I bet Jim could come up with a decent one.
Bought Wembley tickets, behind the goal towards the back of the lower tier. Might not be best view but should be good atmosphere. There are small concessions available, contrary to stuff I’ve read elsewhere.
How much shit, how quickly was it lost, what grade was it? Was any of this proportional to speed of which Gary Rose's thesis was dissected by the talkback lunatic fringe? Please, we somebody just do a fucking formula!