I think she may actually be too bonkers even for the Muskoverse….although it’s a crowd that includes Jenrick, Braverman, Yaxley-Lennon, Rupert Lowe, Nigel Farage, Lozza Fox.
Well. It is a matter of record that she is collaborating (doing a lot of heavy lifting that, in favour of the Trusster) with Tufton Street think tanks* on this. To the extent that they appear as named sources in evidence to her allegations. This is from the same group of connected companies that largely formed the advice for her premiership. Also that same group that fund many, particularly right wing, political figures. That largely align with the Global destabilising propaganda movement, and promote russian foreign policy around the world - if not explicitly labelled as such. You might say Fascists conspiring against democracy with a significant, bottomless, unknown source of funding. It is of course possible that Truss is the mastermind behind this well coordinated, limitlessly funded, structured global fascist movement, and is cleverly hiding in the guise of a hapless middle management buffoon. But on balance it wouldn't be my first guess.
* Source of funding not a matter of record, yet constantly interfering in the sovereignty of the UK, and promoting actions of harm against it.
Be that as it may, using the law to try to silence Starmer's free speech seems a very odd way to impress Elon Musk. I think the 'malicious idiot' theory is still on the table.
Perhaps, but the only response I've heard so far to Truss's ridiculous writ is laughter from all sides. It won't silence Starmer and it won't impress Musk or the American loonies of his ilk. It doesn't have the ring of 'carefully constructed conspiratorial policy' at all, just idiocy.