• 31 Dec 2023, 10:58 p.m.

    Is that true?

  • 31 Dec 2023, 11:08 p.m.

    Would certainly count as a solid medium for me.

  • 31 Dec 2023, 11:40 p.m.

    Every single scooter trip I have taken has replaced a walk, not a drive. Florist, on the other hand, appears to be using one to replace a drive. I would wager you don’t have a clue what proportion of scooter journeys replace car journeys as oppose to PT and other active transport.

    Most of the people I see riding them around Melbourne are young, and usage is in the city and inner suburbs.. so very much tilted towards a population that does not own/drive cars very much. Based on observation (which is not data, of course) I suspect that Florist is an admirable outlier and that scooters around here are mainly used to replace tram and walking trips, and because they are quite fun. If that is the case, the public benefit conversation is very different.

    Most of the time I’ve used a scooter has been to go to the football when it’s been hot enough that I didn’t fancy the walk. Never once has there been a scooter available for the return trip. If I had a commute that could be a Car vs Scooter choice I would probably get my own scooter. Or a bike (which is an objectively better choice for those able). I’m not sure I’d be willing to rely on a shared scheme.

    A thousand commuters using scooters sounds great, but that’s a thousand scooters all being used at the same time. But then what happens to all those scooters parked outside offices at 9am? Unless there is a good amount of people grabbing them to do something else, and leaving them around and about the office areas by 5pm, it’s not going to work out and if you actually want to subsidies things to get that benefit of reduced car journeys you’d be much better off subsidising private purchases of scooters than a shared scheme that doesn’t deliver what you want.

    Which is all back to my original point.. we just don’t have the data to be making these decisions yet. Let the private sector work it out, accept that some things will fail, and spend public money on stuff that we know works.

  • 1 Jan 2024, 12:23 a.m.

    But made you more productive (economically, or socially) as a result of a reduced journey time?

    Nope, no idea. Like people had no real data on car journeys, and highly unnecessary journeys by car when new real alternatives might exist. But we are happy to throw cars into the mix without data, and pay for the consequences as a contributing society. Throwing a bit of money at other possible solutions doesn't seem a terribly onerous imposition on freedom or economic activity.

    I very much see legislation allowing the safe use of personally owned personal transport to play an important role here. As I have already said. Not everyone will want to use such transport for specific defined round trip journeys, opportunistic and impulse is better catered for by an available pool. Which should form part of an integrated policy.

    Perhaps some clever bod could invent the internet and a website that offered over subscribed provision at a discount, subject to return to a specific location at a specific time. Let the market provide.

    We do have some data on how unsustainable increasing car use is, and how public transport is failing. We could look at other possible solutions, rather than just throwing more cars, car parks, and knackered roads at the problem. For which there is also no real data.

    A bike seldom folds up into a rucksack, can't be taken on public transport, and gets stolen more than pretty much any other thing. Not always objectively better.

  • 1 Jan 2024, 1:03 a.m.

    Yes. But irrelevant as I was (clearly) specifically responding to the suggestion that scooters will meaningfully reduce car usage. Reducing car usage would be a clear public benefit, me being a bit less sweaty when I arrive at the football would not.

    So letting cars proliferate without understanding what would happen was bad, but letting scooters proliferate without understanding what might happen is good. Is this why you didn’t go back to your jibe at the government for being slow to legalise private use once several people pointed out why that might actually be sensible? You’re just going to damn whatever decision is made. What would this whole discussion be like if instead of Nottingham’s scooter co going bust, the government had jumped in with a subsidy scheme to bail them out and keep them going?

    Money is being thrown at the relevant other possible solution. This is a discussion about who’s money that should be.

    Agreed. Again, I was responding to your 1000 commuter car journeys.

    Great idea and if none of the scooter schemes currently being run have a) encountered this issue and b) tried that solution, that is disappointing, and surprising. Of course, discounts for non-peak use (and penalties for failure to return to the agreed zone?) would probably go down very badly much like ‘surge pricing’ for Uber has a bad rep. Price discrimination, even where it is fair and rational, is unpopular.

    Again, the alternative we are discussing is being tried in lots of places. This is a discussion about who pays for it.

    Yes. ‘For those able’ should be interpreted widely.

  • 1 Jan 2024, 1:14 a.m.

    edit: delete, didn't read the other post fully.

  • 4 Jan 2024, 4:43 p.m.

    Swim for it!

  • 4 Jan 2024, 6:04 p.m.

    Our power has been out since about half four.

  • 4 Jan 2024, 6:34 p.m.

    Although just had a call from the national grid asking us not to use kettle/ oven/ tumble drier.

  • 4 Jan 2024, 6:38 p.m.

    That's one heck of a machine.

  • Squad
    4 Jan 2024, 7:18 p.m.

    1.21 gigawatts!

  • 4 Jan 2024, 7:36 p.m.

    I asked tricky for a recommendation.

  • 4 Jan 2024, 8:13 p.m.

    I wish I'd been on that call. "Hey Simon, do you mind taking it easy on the Trickytron 3000 for a bit mate? You've just taken down half of Oxfordshire, including a hospital, four old folks' homes, and most of the education system. We were starting to wonder if you were planning on running as a Tory councilor."

  • 4 Jan 2024, 9:36 p.m.

    Is there any sort of e-scooter restriction in place?

    Asking for a Shady.