They're just balancing their books, based on bets taken. As bookies do. When England are the bookies favourites to win the world cup, it doesn't mean that they are the best team, and most likely to win it. It means that England fans who bet are the most deranged financially imprudent idiots.
You won't. I know this because I've worked with people for who this was true of.
What happens is that the bookies track your betting patterns and stop you getting sufficient money on to make a dent in them. You can make a small living on the spread of betting against the wider constituency of mug punters, but once you start making serious inroads, they'll shut you down.
Well yes. You have to be clever about it. I got my account closed by Bet365 about 10 years ago as I' was exploiting a minor loophole and making £50 most weeks. Did it for a few months then they shut my account.
I've no idea what you're blathering on about now. The point I was making is that bookies will have factored into their odds that we are in Europe. They're not stupid.
Yes, the bookies will have noticed some of the obvious factors that the average forest fan appears not to have. Their model doesn't have to be brilliant to make money. People just have to keep being thick.
Are you sure? 3.75 in decimal odds is 26.67% opta (who don't allow for fixture congestion) have us at 24.02% Allowing for an over round, that seems remarkably similar.
I would have thought we'd keep him. I'd be surprised if we got a silly offer for him, hasn't he only played a few first team games (here and in Brazil). A CB of him and Bindon (with Abbott as back up) may be fine at Championship level.