• 10 Nov 2025, 9:08 a.m.

    That's one of the ways to go. So you might look to have players wide running past, and a number 10 who makes runs past the 9 (Bellingham) with a number 9 heading the wrong way and not pinning the defence. The alternative is play a nine to stretch and pin the defence, in which case you can play players who come inside and threaten the goal second phase as your width, and a 10 who operates in the pocket. There isn't a right or wrong...but there is an impact on the sort of teams that you will score goals against. There will be rich pickings back post second phase against less powerful/organised teams who struggle to cope with wide runs and a deep midfield run....your better teams will cough up less of those sort of chances, and might struggle more with good movement to open space in front of goal for the more technical rapier like number 10.

    Personally I'd sacrifice the 4/5/6th against moldova, for the ability to give a spain more trouble. YMMV.

  • 10 Nov 2025, 9:11 a.m.

    Ok. Let’s try it. Again.

  • 10 Nov 2025, 11:31 a.m.

    I'd argue that what didn't work was pairing Kane with two or three 10s and hoping they find a way to figure out a way to make that work.

  • 10 Nov 2025, 11:54 a.m.

    I think Kane should be playing. Tuchel will definitely pick him if he's fit.

    I can't be bothered trying to explain why these are both true because there's not a cat in hells chance anyone is going to be persuaded that currently thinks otherwise.

  • 10 Nov 2025, 6:32 p.m.

    Definitely. I think it's equally true that Kane will be deadlegs in the heat of the tournament and be out of steam when we really need a world class number 9 making the difference.

    I'm totally okay with giving it a spin. I'm totally not okay with not having prepared a contingency plan. Again.

  • 10 Nov 2025, 6:55 p.m.

    Pray that Watkins gets back into form. Is there another credible centre forward? Bowen is the closest but he’s better wide.

  • 10 Nov 2025, 7:40 p.m.

    When Kane isn't doing it. Again. An acceptable answer is not "we've not looked at any alternatives. Ever".

    There are ways of winning high level football matches without Harry Kane playing. You know the problems, you know your options. Find the solution, at least as an alternative.

    When he's cranking through his creaky old shit routine in the baking heat, and miles off it, I'm expecting something better than hoping it deflects in off him. Again.

    "We were hoping he'd get through this one" doesn't cut it. He won't. Did I mention that it's going to be in the summer. After a long season. And hot?

    There's some monumental fuckwitted thinking around the England brand idol.

  • 10 Nov 2025, 7:54 p.m.

    I'm trying figure out which campaign you put more into: Kane out or Marlon in.

  • 10 Nov 2025, 8:18 p.m.

    I'm not Kane out. I'm have an alternative to Kane for when he's shit again. I am pro using the unbelievable attacking talents that we have in the best possible way...not being hampered by a striker who closes their space and is always goosed at the sharp end when it matters.

    I am mostly bemused that we don't occasionally sub him, or develop other options in the vast array of games we play where we could win with me up front.

    ...it would definitely be marlon in.

  • 10 Nov 2025, 9:13 p.m.

    You know I am fully on-board with this, rather than picking Sir Harry because he wants to get his stats up against San Marino and Andorra.
    Sadly, it's far too nuanced for the average football fan, who just look at those figures, and not the numbers behind them (penalties vs back-post tap-ins vs meaningful goals vs goals against top-tier opposition).
    It's no coincidence that England's (and Bellingham's) best performance at the last Euros was the first 40 minutes against Serbia when Sir Harry actually listened to instructions and stayed up front, stretching the play and occupying the Serbian centre-halves - it ended when he got bored and started dropping deep, occupying Bellingham's space and nullifying Jude's influence.

  • 10 Nov 2025, 10:57 p.m.

    As a Bayern fan I'm obviously delighted that Kane is smacking in goals aplenty. I'm also glad that he's surrounded by some combination of Olise, Diaz and Gnabry to do the running. I'm also glad that Kompany has de-Tucheled Bayern. It was always going to take a season at least. I'm also glad that Kane appears to have discovered the ability to drop deep to get involved and still manage to catch up with the attack. I'm not sure how him dropping deep would've affected Bayern's play had Musiala not been injured since the Club World Cup. I'm also baffled that Kompany doesn't sub him sooner when games are clearly won. He was even subbed on with 30 minutes to go recenly with the game won. I'm also reasonably certain that he will clock up a lot of minutes for Bayern - even with their winter break - and likely be some sort of dead-legged next summer. And as Tricky and Jeff allude - England (Tuchel) won't have cultivated alternatives.

  • 11 Nov 2025, 8:25 a.m.

    Still not sure who these alternatives are?

    Watkins isn't being picked because he's out of form but he's got 20 caps, so can hardly say he hasn't been looked at. Welbeck is the top scoring Englishman in the premier league but if you are concerned about Kane's physical condition at the end of the season ... Welbeck is 35 in two weeks. Bowen has 19 caps as well.

  • 11 Nov 2025, 8:46 a.m.

    Checks the championship top scorers table... maybe it's time for Carlton Morris's long overdue international call up?

  • 11 Nov 2025, 9:16 a.m.

    But how many starts have they had? How many times have they been picked to start a game when Sir Harry is fit? How many times has Bowen played CF for England? Just counting caps (when it could be a two-minute appearance off the bench when they don't touch the ball) is far too simplistic.
    We've already qualified for the World Cup - why not give Sir Harry a rest this international break and actually have a look at some of the options.

  • 11 Nov 2025, 9:39 a.m.

    This

  • 11 Nov 2025, 11:55 a.m.

    I don't disagree with that but we still have the fundamental problem that the (non)challenges involved in qualification are entirely irrelevant to the challenges involved in actually winning a tournament.

    How many goals Ollie Watkins (or Bowen or Carlton Morris) can score against Albania doesn't tell us anything about whether he can do it in a final against Argentina or France.