• 22 Jan 2026, 11:58 p.m.

    Circumstances change timelines and outcomes, is the serious point.

    I have observed before that teams often exhibit their most potent form while they retain a bit from the old one, and have got a bit from the new one. Particularly when they are opposite styles. Then it swings away from good, to transition.

    So the question becomes: is where you might be ultimately headed, better then where you left? For me, yes. I agree with the football values of a Dyche. I don't those of a postanoclue chap.

    But you can't dismiss overlaid factors like losing the player that opened up the passing lanes on the pitch with his runs, and losing the bloke who sticks it in the netty thing. I mean you can, if you have equivalent level operatives - even in a different style.

    But we haven't.

    If you look at the likes of McAtee, Hutchinson, Savona, you are going to have to score a lot of goals. Because you sure as shit are going to concede them. As much as Jesus is quality at getting the ball under, and with his movement, he isn't a finisher (at the level, yet). There are almost no goals in the rest of the side, even from penalties.

    Not sure what amazing tactics and man management people think can quickly solve those problems. I think its going to take time and work.

    On a good day we look solid. On a bad day we look like they haven't taken the ideas on board well, and they are training harder than they are used to. The shape looks okay to me.... But that can't compensate for players being shit without the ball, and not being able to defend one on one.

    There was some garbage stuff out there tonight. I'm pretty sure Dyche didn't send the Serbinator out there to defend one on one like an U14's winger. Given that's what he did, letting his man run free in the channels and through him, I'm not sure what he could have done tactically. Beyond predicting that the centre halves would look like novices, and finding a sweeper that we don't have to play behind them.

    Barring our top eight or so, there's width but not the requisite quality. First choice side has obvious problems. Make a couple of changes and we are miles off it. Coupled with a bit of regression to the mean, a bit of being over footballed, a bit of disruption and lack of confidence, and a soupçon of extra injury (exacerbated by psychological factors), there are problems outside coaching and motivation.

    I think Dyche has us achieving top half outcomes in league and Europe, despite these problems.

    What are people expecting? We aren't really an established top flight side yet, in terms of squad at the level. Despite the massive overperformance of last season. That opportunity was largely squandered with the summer transfer dealings.

  • 23 Jan 2026, 12:19 a.m.

    The tactics of not trying to score goals?

  • 23 Jan 2026, 12:28 a.m.

    I promise you that's not the strategy. Even when it's the outcome.

    "Morgan, whatever you do, try to miss a penalty if we get one. We are trying not to score".

    Honestly, most football fans are completely bonkers.

  • 23 Jan 2026, 12:37 a.m.

    How the fuck did we end up playing in Europe without a fucking centre forward though? Seriously? Im on the fence with Dyche but he's got a get out with this. Why the hell did we let kulimendo go before we got a replacement in?

  • 23 Jan 2026, 12:43 a.m.

    Our 1 attacking tactic appears to be to slowly work our way towards the corner of the box to cross. Unfortunately 3 of the 4 exponents (CHO, Hutch, Wiliams) are on their weaker foot side so cut inside. By the time they set it up the defence is set (facing man and ball), there isn't much to aim at and the crosses are quite shit.
    What else do we do?
    Well, we punt high balls at an isolated Jesus. He battles heroically to hold the ball up but the only option is laying it back. Rarely is anyone near him. Never is anyone running past him.
    Do we isolate full backs with our wingers? Not really. We switch play so slowly that cover gets across and even if it doesn't our wide players seem incapable or unwilling to run at the full back.
    Do we play out from the back? Well, we sort of try to sometimes. If Murillo is playing. Otherwise Luiz or Anderson drop so deep that there's just a huge void in front of them. Zinc for all his defensive deficiencies would come over from left back to try and do that. Never quite delivered.
    Do we try and be a set piece side? Stop laughing at the back. As mentioned above the wide players cut in and deliver crosses to defenders with back to goal. Easy clearances away from goal. Rarely do we attack the byline and cross forcing defenders facing their own goal to concede corners. And even when we get a corner it tends to be quite shit. 83 minutes tonight for our first corner, floated between the centre and the far post and an easy clearing punch for the keeper.
    Do we press and try to turn the ball over high up the field? Sort of. Warily. Cautiously. Not that hard to play around. Bar an Archie Gray level clanger.

    So what else are we doing to score a goal? Because I'm not seeing anything. Other than MGW flicks. And lets not go there.

    Edit - I forgot that when the weaker footed wide players don't cross they square it for one of the defenders or a deep lying Anderson to shoot optimistically from distance which either hits one of many defenders or finds row Z.

  • 23 Jan 2026, 12:51 a.m.

    But the strategy of letting him take it is poor.

    He's missed two and almost fucked the third of the last three. There must be someone better on the pitch to take one.

    The constant sideways and backwards passing with no threat whatsoever for 90 minutes. That's players not executing the strategy, or is it the strategy? Let's be cautious, try not to concede and not lose rather than try to win.