• 4 Aug 2025, 10:28 a.m.

    With any of these things, don't you have to be wary of someone who's talking up his own book? And he's still talking about LLMs, rather than what would have been regarded as AI previously. As far as I'm aware, any of these models need to be told what to do and then suck in a bunch of information to do that (or something that looks like what they were told to do).

    So they could (for example) probably come up with a reasonable plan for a bank robbery but wouldn't and couldn't come up with the idea to rob a bank in the first place.

  • 4 Aug 2025, 10:34 a.m.

    To be fair, it will go badly for the vast majority of people on the planet whatever they do or don't do now. We've had decades of flying people round the world to talk about how we're destroying the planet and all that time we've been burning more fossil fuels and using more natural resources and materials than ever before. We're that stupid. Even if AI wasn't such a blatantly malevolent technology its use of energy, water, land and resources should kill it in its tracks, but it won't.

  • 4 Aug 2025, 10:43 a.m.

    Every few years something comes along that will take all of our jobs. I’ve lost mine to computers, the internet, outsourcing and offshoring. Except actually I haven’t.

    AI is a term so wide as to be useless. It’s also being hyped like nothing else ever by the people who are currently losing many billions of dollars coming up with, thus far, zero products or ideas that actually have mass appeal and/or a path to economic sustainability.

    There are loads of ideas being developed, and used, that sit under the AI umbrella and will have real impact. But it’s mostly iteration, not revolution.

    Recently another team at our place demod the amazing new AI powered tool to answer routine questions about company policies. It was a search engine. It’s better than the existing search tools that were available but, nonetheless, it was just search.

    There’s a lot of that. Things that are just automations or algorithms are now called AI. LLM’s main everyday use case is as an iteration on spelling and grammar checks. They are not intelligence.. they are guessing engines.

    I know that there are good applications for things like writing code (aka operating within a set of clear paramaters) and my experience of other people using LLM’s to summarise stuff is that they do ok (assuming the stakes are low enough that the the gaps and hallucinations don’t matter). LLM’s for creating writing are absolute dogshit and as they are trained on a universe of bad writing, it’s hard to see how they get better at that… but time will tell.

    Jobs will change as they always do as technology evolves. I predict, with confidence, that all these apocalyptical/utopian predictions will prove to be far off the mark and the change will, at most, look a bit like the change that came from the internet.

  • 4 Aug 2025, 10:47 a.m.

    That uses 10x the energy of a normal search.

  • 4 Aug 2025, 10:59 a.m.

    Your job hasn't gone but many others have. Relative wealth insulates you from the worst impacts.

    I have huge concerns about the societal impacts of AI that will build upon but greatly expand the negative impacts of the internet.

    But burning the planet is going to distract from at least some of it.

  • 4 Aug 2025, 11:45 a.m.

    But others have been created. It’s not like the computer age thus far has left us with ever-rising levels of unemployment. I don’t see why AI would be any different. If it replaces things we currently use humans to do, we will find other things for humans to do. Unless this is the thing that finally changes the way shit has gone for all of human existence. Time was that 95% of us weren’t able to do more than grow our own food.. but I don’t see 94.5% of the population lining up at the job centre cos there’s not much work going on in farming.

    Loads of the new jobs are shit, obviously, but loads of the pre-computer jobs were shit too. There are actual things that could be done to improve society for the people whose standards of living have not kept up through the computer age and it would be a far better use of our collective energy to try and do those things than it is to indulge in the fevered imaginings of tech-billionaires and all the business twats who are all over AI in exactly the same way they were all over blockchain a few years ago.

    You can tell it’s mostly hype by the way that 95% of the talk is about what AI could do, as opposed to what it actually and foreseeably can do.

  • 4 Aug 2025, 1:07 p.m.

    What business model? 'The business model' is just something used to put all our stuff in the hands of the few...then they will have their own pool of resources to meet every need they have, and you will be surplus to requirements.

    Think of it as the new feudalism, with reduced numbers of estate workers consuming valuable turnips. There will be nothing for you to buy, with nothing. It will all be gone. So will you.

  • 4 Aug 2025, 1:34 p.m.

    Err Skynet!

    Of course we are doomed.

    Chicago: Deleting everything.

  • 4 Aug 2025, 7:28 p.m.

    Except
    1 it only really theoretically helps experienced coders
    And
    2 it actually means things take longer

  • 4 Aug 2025, 8:13 p.m.

    ...anyone seriously think that whoever is driving the Musk hasn't thought of that?

    It? You mean the bit that you get access to? Reassuring isn't it?

    Also bear in mind the crushed baby juice and superior cosmetic surgery, that the rich and famous have access to where you don't. You don't get to see the top gear. (the defence and intelligence sectors have been working this way for my whole lifetime).

  • 4 Aug 2025, 8:26 p.m.

    Predictive text coding from LLMs, I mean.

    And yeah, on this, I think we're pretty much in agreement

  • 5 Aug 2025, 8:18 a.m.

    Is this a reference to adrenochrome?

  • 5 Aug 2025, 8:44 a.m.

    Whatever embryo derived product they were using to keep Philipos going for so long.